There are also two fundamental flaws in the discussion of the US in the "Longer Telegram".
THE LONGER TELEGRAM DRIVERS
In fact, all the current strategic drivers that cause tensions in Sino-US relations have already existed and have restricted China's willingness to "cooperate with the United States." Neither the current or previous Chinese leaders have the intention of reshaping the international order in the Chinese way. The author believes that the challenges the United States faces today from China are almost entirely caused by its personal leadership and ideological thinking. The second fundamental error in the report's analysis of China is to focus solely on Chinese leaders. This is because Chinese leaders are almost certain that a world order centered on China is impossible to achieve, and the pursuit of such an order is unsustainable and will backfire. But China is not trying to "destroy liberal values," "replace democratic capitalism," and "become the center of a new global order." Beijing will be content to play a leading role in the world order, not the only one. China indeed seeks to maximize its global wealth, power and influence-and the appeal of its governance and development model, and it has consistently pursued this goal. First, the author exaggerates China's strategic intentions and ambitions. The report has two fundamental flaws in the analysis of China. The article also detailed many "open areas of strategic competition." In these areas, the United States must be prepared to compete with China for diplomatic influence, economic and military superiority on a global scale. This includes a list of "major national security concerns"-such as arms control, cyber security, "military or economic aggressiveness" and "crimes against humanity"-which Washington will maintain constant pressure on Beijing on these issues. "Longer Telegram" outlines the main elements of the countermeasures the United States should take.
The author made a broad summary of Beijing's strategy, pointing out that China attaches importance to the country's power balance with the United States emphasizing Deng Xiaoping's policy at the end of the Cold War, which is to "hide our capacities and bide our time" until the strategic conditions are beneficial to China It also emphasized how Beijing has seized the opportunity to transcend this stage based on its assessment of the narrowing of the power gap between China and the United States in the past 10 years. But the report's diagnosis of the problem is not as accurate as Kenan, and the countermeasures proposed are not as realistic as Kenan's. Washington urgently needs a comprehensive, bipartisan national strategy to meet this challenge.
THE LONGER TELEGRAM PROFESSIONAL
The former official is said to have "deep professional knowledge and experience in dealing with China." The report, called the "Longer Telegram" by the media, warned that China poses a profound and unprecedented strategic challenge to the United States. Last week, "a former senior US government official" tried to imitate Kenan by publishing an article anonymously. X" in July 1947, made Kennan famous as the proponent of the theory of "containment" of the Soviet Union. This telegram, and his opinions published in Foreign Affairs magazine under the pseudonym "Mr. This was later known as the "long telegram".
State Department a report of thousands of words on post-war Soviet theory, policies, behavior motives and practices, and the countermeasures the United States should take. February 1st article on the website of the US "National Interest" magazine, original title: Why "Longer Telegrams" Cannot Solve China's Challenges In February 1946, when the US was stationed in the Soviet Union George Kennan, charge d'affaires of the embassy, sent back to the U.S.
0 kommentar(er)
